Difference between revisions of "Common Foreign and Security Policy"
From Power Shifts wiki
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''Common Foreign and Security Policy ('''CFSP''') has a range of tools that can be used to promote human rights and democratisation: | + | The '''Common Foreign and Security Policy''' ('''CFSP''') <ref> The EU’s Foreign and Security Policy explained [https://europa.eu/european-union/topics/foreign-security-policy_en]</ref> has a range of tools that can be used to promote human rights and democratisation: |
• Common Strategies, common positions and joint actions<br /> | • Common Strategies, common positions and joint actions<br /> | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
• Dialogue and consultations with third countries<br /> | • Dialogue and consultations with third countries<br /> | ||
− | • Guidelines on EU policy towards third countries on specific human rights themes<br /> | + | • Guidelines on [[Category:Policies of the European Union|EU policy]] towards third countries on specific [[Human Rights|human rights]] themes<br /> |
The Policy has developed gradually over many years, enables the EU to speak and act as one in world affairs. <br /> | The Policy has developed gradually over many years, enables the EU to speak and act as one in world affairs. <br /> | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Policies of the European Union]] | [[Category:Policies of the European Union]] |
Latest revision as of 11:06, 4 April 2017
The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) [1] has a range of tools that can be used to promote human rights and democratisation:
• Common Strategies, common positions and joint actions
• Démarches and declarations
• Dialogue and consultations with third countries
• Guidelines on towards third countries on specific human rights themes
The Policy has developed gradually over many years, enables the EU to speak and act as one in world affairs.
Acting together gives the EU's 28 members far greater clout than they would have if each pursued its own policies.